How Can a Blockchain QA Engineer Clearly Explain Gas-Optimization Trade-Offs in Interviews Without Sounding Unsure or Overclaiming?
Gas optimization often feels like guesswork. Developers proudly say they “saved 10 gas,” but I’m never sure how meaningful that really is. In a recent Layer-2 bridge audit, I saw a patch that reduced storage reads but slightly increased calldata.
It passed the profiler, but I struggled to explain the trade-off confidently. In blockchain QA interviews, how do you quantify optimization in a way that shows you understand the impact — not just a screenshot from a Foundry trace? Are there accepted ways to communicate whether an improvement is genuinely valuable and not just noise?