• Struggling with Hardhat debugging as a junior — how do seniors validate Solidity state transitions, revert paths, and storage changes without relying on console.log spam?

    Abasi T

    Abasi T

    @ggvVaSO
    Updated: Dec 27, 2025
    Views: 239

    I’ve been building my first few smart contracts using Hardhat, and whenever something breaks, I fall back to spamming console.log until it somehow works. It feels messy, and honestly, I rarely walk away understanding why the failure happened.

    I keep hearing experienced developers say that good debugging isn’t about logs — it’s about understanding state transitions, invariants, and assumptions. But I’m struggling to translate that into an actual workflow.

    Most of my issues are things like:

    • unexpected reverts with no clear reason

    • balances or allowances not matching what I expected

    • tests failing even though the logic “looks right”

    I’m using Hardhat + ethers, mostly unit tests, and I often feel like I’m guessing rather than reasoning.

    How do you personally approach debugging smart contracts once you’re past the beginner stage?
    What habits, mental models, or test structures helped you stop chasing symptoms and start finding root causes?

    Would love to hear how you think about debugging at a deeper level — not just tools, but how you think through failures.

    3
    Replies
Howdy guest!
Dear guest, you must be logged-in to participate on ArtOfBlockChain. We would love to have you as a member of our community. Consider creating an account or login.
Replies
  • FintechLee

    @FintechLee2mos

    As someone who mentors juniors, I’ve seen this console.log spiral hundreds of times. What helped me break out of it was learning that debugging isn’t about “finding the line” — it’s about reconstructing the story of the state transition

    When a test fails, I don’t touch logs for the first few minutes. I start by reading the test description and writing down what the state should be before and after the call. Hardhat traces make a lot more sense once you already know the expected transitions.

    I also log only at decision points — before each require, before each branch, and once at the end. That’s it. No inside-loop random prints. Another habit: after fixing the bug, I intentionally break the test with a reversed condition to confirm my understanding.

     This turns debugging from emotional panic into a repeatable process. Over time you’ll rely on logs less and on reasoning more — that’s what senior developers actually do.

  • SmartChainSmith

    @SmartChainSmith2mos

    From an auditor perspective, the biggest jump is realizing that a failing test is just incomplete information about a state transition. When juniors keep adding console.logs, they’re actually masking the real issue: unclear mental models of storage, invariants, and effects. 

    My routine always starts with isolating the failure — run just the failing test with Hardhat’s built-in tracing so you get the exact revert location. Then map the function on paper: input assumptions → require checks → effects → events.

    I only log boundary assumptions: “balance before,” “balance after,” “role at call time,” “flag state before condition.” This aligns logs with invariants instead of noise. And once you learn to reason in these chunks, you’ll notice Hardhat’s traces suddenly become readable. 

    Debugging becomes about validating the expected invariant, not searching for a magical line. That’s when you graduate from console.log to real Solidity thinking.

  • FintechLee

    @FintechLee1mo

    I coach juniors to treat debugging as a structured narrative, not a scramble for visibility. The best devs don’t log more—they log smarter. My rule is simple: every log must answer a question, not just print a variable. For example: “Do I actually satisfy this precondition?” “Is the flag flipped before the next require?” “Did the balance update match the test’s expectation?”

    To help them internalize this, I make them write a “debugging checklist” for every tricky test:

    • Write the expected state before the action.

    • Write the expected state after the action.

    • Log only the delta at the start and end of the function.

    • After fixing the bug, break the function intentionally to confirm your understanding.

    Once they follow this, their PRs improve drastically, and debugging stops feeling like drowning in Hardhat logs. You’ll get there faster than you think.

  • Shubhada Pande

    @ShubhadaJP1mo

    Interesting topic — almost every junior hits this same debugging wall. Debugging isn’t about tools; it’s about thinking clearly through state transitions and validating assumptions instead of relying on console logs. If you want to deepen your debugging workflow, start with these discussions:

    If you're stuck on a real test failure, feel free to post it. The community can help you reason through the state transition step-by-step.

  • Emma T

    @5INFFa41mo

    One trick that helped me: snapshot key state before the function call and compare it to the post-state in one clean log. Logging “the diff” makes debugging ten times clearer than random prints. When you see the actual delta — the balance, role, or flag that changed — the bug becomes obvious. Hardhat debugging becomes structured instead of chaotic.

Home Channels Search Login Register