ArtOfBlockChain
ArtOfBlockChain

  • Web3 Job Offer Dilemma: Should You Accept Tokens When Tokenomics Isn’t Published Yet?

    Bondan S

    Bondan S

    @Layer1Bondan
    Updated: Nov 5, 2025
    Views: 434

    Just received a Smart Contract Developer offer from an early Layer-1 startup (India-based). The base pay is modest, but a large chunk is in native tokens locked for 3 years.

    Here’s my dilemma: the tokenomics isn’t finalized yet so no clarity on supply, vesting, or liquidity timelines. I’m worried they could terminate me before the lock-in ends and claim I didn’t qualify for token release.

    I’ve seen this happen in a DeFi team before. For anyone who’s accepted similar hybrid packages, how do you evaluate token compensation and protect yourself contractually when the project’s token isn’t live yet?

    4
    Replies
Howdy guest!
Dear guest, you must be logged-in to participate on ArtOfBlockChain. We would love to have you as a member of our community. Consider creating an account or login.
Replies

  • Anne Taylor

    @BlockchainMentorAT • 6mos

    I’ve advised a few devs in this exact spot. The main trap is treating “locked tokens” like guaranteed equity — they’re not. Unless the company has finalized tokenomics and filed a legal entity with equity-to-token mapping, your tokens are a promise, not a deliverable.

    Before signing, ask for: 
     A “vesting clause” tied to calendar time, not project milestones. 
     A termination clause defining “cause” (so they can’t invent inefficiency claims). 
     A written “conversion schedule” once tokenomics is published.

    I also check if they’re using a SAFE-T or SAFT instrument — if not, you’re exposed. If they can’t show a cap table or token allocation framework, walk away or demand more fiat.

  • AuditWardenRashid

    @AuditWarden • 5mos

    I’ve been offered tokens in two Web3 startups; only one ever reached listing.
    The difference? Governance transparency.
    Ask: who signs off token unlocks?

    If it’s a founder-controlled multisig, your risk is high. I’d also evaluate the project’s regulatory region — if they’re registered in Seychelles or BVI but hiring in India, you may have no legal recourse. For valuation, use comparable L1 metrics: circulating supply, FDV, team allocation, and vesting cliffs.

    You can estimate potential upside with simple Monte-Carlo modeling (FDV × allocation ÷ vesting period). Sounds technical, but it shows you’re serious and pushes them to share real data.

  • AuditWardenRashid

    @AuditWarden • 2w

    Just adding: if they haven’t yet finalized tokenomics, the offer letter should include “subject to final token approval” language. That protects you legally from any later manipulation. Always consult a contract lawyer before signing.

  • Shubhada Pande

    @ShubhadaJP • 2w

    Token-based job offers often blur the same salary questions remote developers already face. Before deciding, think beyond tokenomics — what’s your cash runway, cost-of-living index, and geographic pay range? We’ve had in-depth discussions on this: • How Do You Handle the Geographic Pay Gap in Remote Blockchain Jobs? — community stories on regional salary differences (https://artofblockchain.club/discussion/how-do-you-tackle-the-geographic-pay-gap-in-remote-blockchain-jobs ) • Fresher Blockchain Developer Salary in India: What Should I Expect in 2025? — realistic entry-level benchmarks (https://artofblockchain.club/discussion/blockchain-developer-salary-for-fresher-in-india ) • How to Answer the “What Are Your Salary Expectations?” Question as a Blockchain Developer — negotiation psychology that works in Web3 (https://artofblockchain.club/discussion/how-to-answer-the-what-are-your-salary-expectations-question-as-a ) Together, these threads form a complete view of how proof-based salary transparency should evolve in Web3 — whether your pay comes in fiat, tokens, or a mix. Let’s keep building that culture of open negotiation and informed choices.

Home Channels Search Login Register