• As a QA tester in smart-contract teams, which actions truly help reduce audit churn?

    Tushar Dubey

    Tushar Dubey

    @DataChainTushar
    Updated: Nov 3, 2025
    Views: 80

    After going through multiple audits across DeFi and gaming projects, I’ve noticed things run far smoother when QA and auditors start overlapping earlier. We often catch logic gaps or inconsistent assumptions long before the official audit even begins, yet many teams still treat QA like a pre-audit cleanup step.

    For those who’ve actually worked closely with auditors, which QA actions made a real difference? What specifically helped reduce back-and-forth during the audit or made auditors trust your reports sooner?

    I’m trying to understand what really keeps the things going so QA feels like an equal partner in the security process.

    4
    Replies
Howdy guest!
Dear guest, you must be logged-in to participate on ArtOfBlockChain. We would love to have you as a member of our community. Consider creating an account or login.
Replies
  • SmartContractGuru

    @SmartContractGuru3w

    Leadership starts when you document for others. I began writing QA playbooks for interns, and seniors noticed. Teaching forces clarity — and clarity is what leaders trade in.

  • BlockchainMentorYagiz

    @BlockchainMentor3w

    I started shadowing project managers — learning sprint planning, dependencies, priorities. Now I bridge security and delivery. Technical depth kept me useful; communication made me lead.

  • Abdil Hamid

    @ForensicBlockSmith3w

    Totally. Bringing auditors in early changes tone completely. We start each sprint asking, “What test data do you value most?” That alignment turns QA from gatekeepers into collaborators. By next audit, they pinged us first for pre-checks — small cultural win.

Home Channels Search Login Register