ArtOfBlockChain
ArtOfBlockChain

  • DevOps to Blockchain: Do Web3 Teams Actually Hire Infra Engineers—or Is It a Dead End?

    SmartChainSmith

    SmartChainSmith

    @SmartChainSmith
    Updated: Dec 21, 2025
    Views: 1.5K

    I’ve been working in DevOps for about 5 years—CI/CD pipelines, cloud infrastructure, automation, reliability work, the usual stuff. Lately, I keep seeing more talk around blockchain and Web3, especially protocol launches, nodes, validators, and infra-heavy systems.

    What I can’t figure out is this: do Web3 teams genuinely value DevOps experience, or do they mostly look for smart contract engineers and protocol devs?

    I’m not worried about learning new tools, but I am worried about wasting time if DevOps ends up being treated as a “support role” rather than something teams actively hire for. Some job posts mention infra or reliability, but it’s not clear how real that demand is.

    If you’ve moved from DevOps into blockchain (or tried and backed out):

    • What actually transferred well?

    • What skills were ignored?

    • What did hiring teams really care about?

    I’m looking for honest stories—good, bad, or ugly—before I commit serious time to this switch.

    9
    Replies
Howdy guest!
Dear guest, you must be logged-in to participate on ArtOfBlockChain. We would love to have you as a member of our community. Consider creating an account or login.
Replies

  • Amanda Smith

    @AmandaS • 1yr

    I made this switch about two years ago, and the biggest surprise was that Web3 DevOps isn’t generic DevOps with crypto slapped on it.

    What transferred cleanly:

    • Cloud cost control (huge in early-stage protocols)

    • CI/CD discipline

    • Incident response and monitoring

    What didn’t:

    • “Set up Jenkins and Kubernetes” alone wasn’t impressive

    • Teams cared more about operating stateful, adversarial systems than clean pipelines

    What helped me get hired was showing I could:

    • Run blockchain nodes reliably

    • Handle chain upgrades and forks

    • Design infra assuming things will break under attack or congestion

    If your DevOps experience includes failure handling at scale, you’re closer than you think. If it’s mostly internal tooling, the gap will feel bigger.

  • Sheza Henry

    @ChainVisionary • 1yr

    From a hiring side, we don’t look for “DevOps” in the traditional sense—we look for infra owners.

    Strong signals we notice:

    • Experience running public-facing, always-on systems

    • Understanding of how blockchains behave under load

    • Comfort debugging things that don’t have StackOverflow answers

    Weak signals:

    • Resume-heavy cloud certs with no real system ownership

    • Generic DevOps portfolios with no Web3 context

    A lot of DevOps candidates fail not because they lack skill, but because they can’t explain how their work maps to decentralized systems. If you can make that bridge clear, you’re competitive.

  • Abdil Hamid

    @ForensicBlockSmith • 2w

    I tried switching from DevOps to Web3 last year and paused after ~8 months.

    Not because there were no jobs—but because the roles I found expected me to:

    Be on-call 24/7

    Handle infra and protocol-level debugging

    Accept startup-level chaos without startup-level learning support

    I realized I enjoyed DevOps when boundaries were clear. In Web3, those boundaries are often blurred. It’s exciting, but not for everyone.

    If you’re considering the switch, be honest about whether you want ownership or stability—Web3 infra roles lean hard toward the former.

  • Victor P

    @TrG6JIR • 2w

    If you want to test this path without burning months:

    Run a node (mainnet or testnet) and document failures

    Learn how chain upgrades actually break infra

    Follow incident postmortems from major protocols

    Stop thinking in tools, start thinking in systems

    DevOps absolutely exists in Web3—but it’s closer to production engineering under uncertainty than classic platform DevOps.

  • Shubhada Pande

    @ShubhadaJP • 2w

    This thread captures a recurring pattern we see on AOB: experienced DevOps engineers aren’t blocked by capability, but by how Web3 infra roles are interpreted during hiring.

    In many teams, “DevOps” isn’t treated as a separate function—it overlaps with protocol reliability, node operations, incident response, and sometimes even security. That’s why candidates who frame their experience around ownership of live, failure-prone systems tend to convert better than those listing tools or certifications.

    For anyone evaluating this transition, it helps to cross-read discussions on career switches into Web3 → 

    https://artofblockchain.club/discussion/should-i-switch-to-blockchain-career

    and threads where hiring expectations become clearer, especially around what teams actually value beyond job titles →

     https://artofblockchain.club/discussion/top-blockchain-job-red-flags-how-to-spot-disorganized-startups-in-web3

    There’s also a strong overlap with infra-heavy roles discussed in the Job Search & Career Navigation hub, where patterns around ownership, on-call reality, and role boundaries surface repeatedly → 

    https://artofblockchain.club/discussion/job-search-web3-career-navigation-hub

    The takeaway isn’t “DevOps does or doesn’t exist in Web3”—it’s that how you position your responsibility matters more than the label. Threads like this help surface those signals early, before people commit months blindly.

Home Channels Search Login Register