How do Technical Product Owners translate complex bridge infra into simple UX language?
As a Technical Product Owner team member for a cross-chain bridge project, I’m stuck balancing developer transparency with user simplicity.
Our bridge supports five networks, but every UX simplification breaks some validator logic or causes RPC desyncs. Engineers want modularity; users want one-click swaps. I can’t keep explaining finality times or gas fees in tooltips.
How do you translate complex infra features into usable design language without dumbing down the protocol?